Court OKs intervenors in aerial spray ban trial

DAVAO CITY (MindaNews/5 June) – The court trial over the impending
implementation of the city’s aerial spray ban enters a new phase as
the Regional Trial Court allowed residents of areas affected by aerial
spraying to be represented as intervenors.

This brings a third party in the tug-of-war between the city’s banana
industry, led by the Pilipino Banana Growers and Exporters Association
(PBGEA), and the respondent (the city government), which is ready to
implement the ordinance later this month.

PBGEA filed for temporary injunction against the ordinance’s
implementation as it contested the city government’s power to pass
such law, among other issues.

A court injunction is a judicial block for a party from proceeding to
a course of action until the case is resolved.RTC Branch 17 Judge Renato Fuentes ruled Tuesday the inclusion of 12
persons to intervene in the case as the trial enters the second week.

Fuentes described the case in an interview with reporters as “high
profile” because it involves many sectors in the community. He said he
has scheduled marathon hearings to expedite the case.

The city government started presenting evidence Tuesday in its defense
why the writ for temporary injunction should not be issued to block
the implementation of the ordinance.

The entry of intervenors was blocked by petitioner PBGEA, claiming the
former’s interests were already represented by the city government.

But Fuentes said the motion was meritorious as the interests of the
residents in the affected areas could be best represented by them, not
by the city government.

The judge allowed the intervenors’ counsel, Raymund Salas, from an
alternative law group supporting the ban, to join the deliberations on
the fifth day of the marathon trial on the case.

He said, however, that he will no longer allow more intervenors in the
trial as it would complicate the case.

Fuentes heard today two out of four witnesses presented by the Davao
City Legal Office in defending its stance to implement the ban as
scheduled. Last week, Fuentes heard PBGEA’s witnesses.

The 12 intervenors, all residents of areas in the city’s third
district directly affected by aerial spraying, include Wilfredo
Mosqueda, Marcelo Villaganes, Crispin Alcomendras, Corazon Sabinada,
Geraldine Catalan, Julieta Lawagon, Rebeca Saligumba, Florencia
Sabandon, Carolina Pilongo, Alejandra Bentoy, Ledevina Adlawan, and
Virgenia Cata-ag.

Apart from PBGEA, Davao Fruits Corporation and the Lapanday
Agricultural and Development Corporation are also complainants.

The trial came in the run-up to the implementation of the ban on June
22, three months after it was passed by the city council and approved
as ordinance by Mayor Rodrigo Duterte.

The city’s banana industry decried that the ordinance was passed without basis.

While the court hearing was ongoing, a group of supporters of the ban
staged a prayer rally outside the Hall of Justice to mark World
Environment Day.

In a 41-page answer to PBGEA’s complaint, the City Legal Office asked
the court to dismiss the case, claiming the city government, through
the city council, gave all the stakeholders, including the
association, the time to air their respective positions on the issue.

He pointed out that the city government has the authority to pass the
ordinance because, under Section 16 of the Local Government Code of
1991, it is mandated to protect the welfare of the people. (Walter I.
Balane / MindaNews)

About mindanaw

A Journalist from Mindanao

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: